[CPN] Fwd: Calling for a Vote on 2 sets of changes sent to you Sept. 6
James Doyle
jadoyle at ucdavis.edu
Thu Sep 19 15:59:30 EDT 2013
Dear Phil and other fellow CPNers,
>Just a reminder: Please vote by the end of the day tomorrow. At
>this point, 7 people (including myself) have voted.
I approve of these changes, and I also support the retention of
"node" in the glossary.
Jim
>Begin forwarded message:
>
>>From: "Cantino, Philip" <<mailto:cantino at ohio.edu>cantino at ohio.edu>
>>
>>Date: September 15, 2013 7:50:24 PM EDT
>>
>>To: Committee on Phylogenetic Nomenclature
>><<mailto:cpn at listserv.ohio.edu>cpn at listserv.ohio.edu>
>>
>>Subject: Calling for a Vote on 2 sets of changes sent to you Sept. 6
>>
>>
>>Dear CPN members,
>>
>>In the absence of any more comments, I am calling for a vote on
>>slightly modified versions of the two sets of proposed code changes
>>I sent you on Sept. 6. The only difference between the attached
>>versions and the Sept. 6 ones is that David M's corrections of
>>typos, formatting, etc. have been incorporated. Kevin and I also
>>agree with his recommendation that "node" be retained in the
>>glossary, and that Note 9.7.1 be modified to say that an
>>apomorphy-based definition necessarily identifies a clade provided
>>that there is only one internal specifier. Those changes from the
>>Sept. 6 proposals are also incorporated in the attached document
>>PhyloCode4c2.
>>
>>I interpret David M's and Brian's comments as a YES vote on the
>>attached versions, unless they tell me otherwise. Everyone else,
>>please vote by this Friday (Sept. 20) by responding to all.
>>
>>Phil
--
James A. Doyle
Department of Evolution and Ecology
University of California
Davis, CA 95616, USA
Telephone: 1-530-752-7591; fax: 1-530-752-1449
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserv.ohio.edu/pipermail/cpn/attachments/20130919/7ff5f041/attachment.html
More information about the CPN
mailing list