<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>Re: [CPN] Fwd: Calling for a Vote on 2 sets of
changes sen</title></head><body>
<div>Dear Phil and other fellow CPNers,</div>
<div><br></div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>Just a reminder: Please vote by the end
of the day tomorrow. At this point, 7 people (including myself)
have voted.</blockquote>
<div><br></div>
<div>I approve of these changes, and I also support the retention of
"node" in the glossary.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Jim<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>Begin forwarded message:</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><b>From:</b> "Cantino, Philip"
<<a href="mailto:cantino@ohio.edu">cantino@ohio.edu</a>><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><b>Date:</b> September 15, 2013 7:50:24
PM EDT<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><b>To:</b> Committee on Phylogenetic
Nomenclature <<a
href="mailto:cpn@listserv.ohio.edu">cpn@listserv.ohio.edu</a>><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><b>Subject: Calling for a Vote on 2 sets
of changes sent to you Sept. 6</b><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><br></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>Dear CPN members,</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><br></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>In the absence of any more comments, I am
calling for a vote on slightly modified versions of the two sets of
proposed code changes I sent you on Sept. 6. The only
difference between the attached versions and the Sept. 6 ones is that
David M's corrections of typos, formatting, etc. have been
incorporated. Kevin and I also agree with his recommendation
that "node" be retained in the glossary, and that Note 9.7.1
be modified to say that an apomorphy-based definition necessarily
identifies a clade provided that there is only one internal specifier.
Those changes from the Sept. 6 proposals are also incorporated
in the attached document PhyloCode4c2.</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><br></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>I interpret David M's and Brian's
comments as a YES vote on the attached versions, unless they tell me
otherwise. Everyone else, please vote by this Friday (Sept. 20)
by responding to all.</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><br></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>Phil</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<div><br></div>
<x-sigsep><pre>--
</pre></x-sigsep>
<div>James A. Doyle<br>
Department of Evolution and Ecology<br>
University of California<br>
Davis, CA 95616, USA<br>
Telephone: 1-530-752-7591; fax: 1-530-752-1449</div>
</body>
</html>