[CPN] Fwd: Calling for a Vote on 2 sets of changes sent to you Sept. 6

[James Doyle]

Dear Phil and other fellow CPNers,

>Just a reminder: Please vote by the end of the day tomorrow.  At 
>this point, 7 people (including myself) have voted.

I approve of these changes, and I also support the retention of 
"node" in the glossary.

Jim

>Begin forwarded message:
>
>>From: "Cantino, Philip" <<mailto:cantino at ohio.edu>cantino at ohio.edu>
>>
>>Date: September 15, 2013 7:50:24 PM EDT
>>
>>To: Committee on Phylogenetic Nomenclature 
>><<mailto:cpn at listserv.ohio.edu>cpn at listserv.ohio.edu>
>>
>>Subject: Calling for a Vote on 2 sets of changes sent to you Sept. 6
>>
>>
>>Dear CPN members,
>>
>>In the absence of any more comments, I am calling for a vote on 
>>slightly modified versions of the two sets of proposed code changes 
>>I sent you on Sept. 6.   The only difference between the attached 
>>versions and the Sept. 6 ones is that David M's corrections of 
>>typos, formatting, etc. have been incorporated.  Kevin and I also 
>>agree with his recommendation that "node" be retained in the 
>>glossary, and that Note 9.7.1 be modified to say that an 
>>apomorphy-based definition necessarily identifies a clade provided 
>>that there is only one internal specifier.  Those changes from the 
>>Sept. 6 proposals are also incorporated in the attached document 
>>PhyloCode4c2.
>>
>>I interpret David M's and Brian's comments as a YES vote on the 
>>attached versions, unless they tell me otherwise.  Everyone else, 
>>please vote by this Friday (Sept. 20) by responding to all.
>>
>>Phil

-- 
James A. Doyle
Department of Evolution and Ecology
University of California
Davis, CA 95616, USA
Telephone:  1-530-752-7591; fax:  1-530-752-1449
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserv.ohio.edu/pipermail/cpn/attachments/20130919/7ff5f041/attachment.html