[CPN] A more detailed counterproposal on species

[Michel Laurin]

Dear colleagues,

     I have now read carefully Phil's suggestions, which I approve. I 
have made a few very minor suggestions in the annotated attached file 
(with changes tracked).

     Best wishes,

     Michel

On 16/01/12 02:23, Cantino, Philip wrote:
> I am following up on the message I sent the CPN on Friday.  In the attached document, I start with a modified version of the broad definition of species I proposed in my last message that we adopt in the code.  I then go through each of the changes proposed by Nico, Brent and David Baum, proposing alternatives in those cases where I disagree with them.  At this point, what I am looking for is the committee's reaction to the general approach I've taken.  I am assuming that even if the committee likes the approach, some of the wording will need fine-tuning.
>
> I look forward to your comments.
>
> Cheers,
> Phil
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CPN mailing list
> CPN at listserv.ohio.edu
> http://listserv.ohio.edu/mailman/listinfo/cpn


-- 
UMR 7207
Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle
Batiment de Géologie	
Case postale 48
43 rue Buffon
F-75231 Paris cedex 05
FRANCE
http://tolweb.org/notes/?note_id=3669

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserv.ohio.edu/pipermail/cpn/attachments/20120116/ac104565/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Cantino's species proposal.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 77312 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://listserv.ohio.edu/pipermail/cpn/attachments/20120116/ac104565/attachment-0001.doc