[CPN] Ratification of the PhyloCode

[George Sangster]

A YES for me too.

All the best,
George

/Dr George Sangster//
//Department of Bioinformatics and Genetics,//
//Swedish Museum of Natural History,//
//P.O. Box 50007,//
//SE–104 05//
//Stockholm, Sweden //
////https://www.researchgate.net/profile/George_Sangster//
/

Op 26-1-2019 om 20:09 schreef Adl, Sina:
>
> Yes, Sina
>
> *Sina Adl **Professor*
>
> Department of Soil Sciences
>
> College of Agriculture and Bioresources
>
>   University of Saskatchewan
>
>   (306) 966-6866
>
> *agbio.usask.ca <http://agbio.usask.ca/>*
>
> Editor-in-Chief, *Rhizosphere*
>
> http://www.journals.elsevier.com/rhizosphere/
>
> *From:*CPN <cpn-bounces at listserv.ohio.edu> *On Behalf Of *Cantino, Philip
> *Sent:* Monday, January 21, 2019 07:35
> *To:* Committee on Phylogenetic Nomenclature <cpn at listserv.ohio.edu>
> *Cc:* Max Langer <mclanger at ffclrp.usp.br>
> *Subject:* Re: [CPN] Ratification of the PhyloCode
>
> Dear CPN members,
>
> No one asked for a delay in calling for a vote to ratify the code. 
>  The only comments since my Jan. 17 message (copied below) came from 
> Max.  Thank you, Max, for your very careful reading.  Kevin and I will 
> check all of the items Max pointed out (mostly typos and wording 
> inconsistencies) and make changes as needed.  However, none of the 
> points he raised affect the functioning of the code, and Max said he 
> is ready to vote regardless, so I see no reason to wait any longer.
>
> Please respond to this email with a Yes or No vote to ratify the code. 
>  It would be great if everyone would vote within a week, i.e., by next 
> Monday, Jan. 28.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Phil
>
>
>
>     On Jan 17, 2019, at 11:05 AM, Cantino, Philip <cantino at ohio.edu
>     <mailto:cantino at ohio.edu>> wrote:
>
>     Dear CPN members,
>
>     Today is the target date I suggested to start a vote to ratify the
>     code.  I initially sent it to you on Dec. 17, and I sent a revised
>     version on January 8 that differed only in the addition of the
>     Preface and revisions of Art. 11.9 and Appendix A.  There was a
>     delay of a couple of days in that second email because the file
>     was too large.  Hopefully, though, you all received it by January
>     11.  Dick Olmstead sent me a couple of small changes in the
>     Preface, but other than that, I haven’t heard from any of you.
>
>     How do you want to proceed?  Do you feel ready to vote now or do
>     you want more time to read it?  Bear in mind that you or previous
>     CPN memberships approved everything that is in the code other than
>     the current versions of the Preface and Appendix A.  However,
>     within reason, I would like the vote to wait until everyone who
>     wants to read the code carefully has time to do so.
>
>     If you do NOT want me to call for a vote soon (let’s say next
>     Monday), please respond to this message and suggest a date that
>     would be realistic for you. _I will interpret a lack of response
>     to mean agreement that I can call for a vote on Monday_.
>
>     Best regards,
>
>     Phil
>
>     Philip D. Cantino
>     Department of Environmental and Plant Biology
>     Ohio University
>     Athens, OH 45701-2979
>
>     Phone: (740) 593-1128
>     Fax: (740) 593-1130
>     email: cantino at ohio.edu <mailto:cantino at ohio.edu>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CPN mailing list
> CPN at listserv.ohio.edu
> http://listserv.ohio.edu/mailman/listinfo/cpn

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.ohio.edu/pipermail/cpn/attachments/20190126/0632d64b/attachment.html>