[CPN] Ratification of the PhyloCode

[Max Langer]

  I vote yes ...

Em seg, 21 de jan de 2019 às 15:11, Richard G. Olmstead <olmstead at uw.edu>
escreveu:

> I vote YES!
>
> Thanks to everyone for your work on this, and especially to Phil and
> Kevin, who have carried the heaviest load.
>
> Cheers,
> Dick
>
>
> On Jan 21, 2019, at 5:35 AM, Cantino, Philip <cantino at ohio.edu> wrote:
>
> Dear CPN members,
>
> No one asked for a delay in calling for a vote to ratify the code.  The
> only comments since my Jan. 17 message (copied below) came from Max.  Thank
> you, Max, for your very careful reading.  Kevin and I will check all of the
> items Max pointed out (mostly typos and wording inconsistencies) and make
> changes as needed.  However, none of the points he raised affect the
> functioning of the code, and Max said he is ready to vote regardless, so I
> see no reason to wait any longer.
>
> Please respond to this email with a Yes or No vote to ratify the code.  It
> would be great if everyone would vote within a week, i.e., by next Monday,
> Jan. 28.
>
> Best regards,
> Phil
>
>
> On Jan 17, 2019, at 11:05 AM, Cantino, Philip <cantino at ohio.edu> wrote:
>
> Dear CPN members,
>
> Today is the target date I suggested to start a vote to ratify the code.
> I initially sent it to you on Dec. 17, and I sent a revised version on
> January 8 that differed only in the addition of the Preface and revisions
> of Art. 11.9 and Appendix A.  There was a delay of a couple of days in that
> second email because the file was too large.  Hopefully, though, you all
> received it by January 11.  Dick Olmstead sent me a couple of small changes
> in the Preface, but other than that, I haven’t heard from any of you.
>
> How do you want to proceed?  Do you feel ready to vote now or do you want
> more time to read it?  Bear in mind that you or previous CPN memberships
> approved everything that is in the code other than the current versions of
> the Preface and Appendix A.  However, within reason, I would like the vote
> to wait until everyone who wants to read the code carefully has time to do
> so.
>
> If you do NOT want me to call for a vote soon (let’s say next Monday),
> please respond to this message and suggest a date that would be realistic
> for you.  *I will interpret a lack of response to mean agreement that I
> can call for a vote on Monday*.
>
> Best regards,
> Phil
>
>
> Philip D. Cantino
> Department of Environmental and Plant Biology
> Ohio University
> Athens, OH 45701-2979
>
> Phone: (740) 593-1128
> Fax: (740) 593-1130
> email: cantino at ohio.edu <cantino at ohio.edu>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CPN mailing list
> CPN at listserv.ohio.edu
> http://listserv.ohio.edu/mailman/listinfo/cpn
>
>
> Richard Olmstead
> Professor of Biology and Herbarium Curator, Burke Museum
> Department of Biology
> Box 355325
> University of Washington
> Seattle, WA 98195
>
> office: 423 Hitchcock Hall
> phone: 206-543-8850
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Max Cardoso Langer Ph.D. (Bristol, UK)
Departamento de Biologia
Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciencias e Letras de Ribeirao Preto
Universidade de Sao Paulo (USP)
Av. Bandeirantes  3900
14040-901     Ribeirao Preto,  SP,  BRAZIL

Phone: +55 16 3315 3844
FAX: +55 16 3315 4886
http://sites.ffclrp.usp.br/paleo/


*A semântica é o último refúgio dos canalhas.*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.ohio.edu/pipermail/cpn/attachments/20190124/ee4945b9/attachment.html>