[CPN] Proposed New Articles Regarding Panclade Names

[Graham, Sean]

Jim's points make sense to me; otherwise OK by me too,

Sean

________________________________
From: CPN [cpn-bounces at listserv.ohio.edu] on behalf of James Doyle [jadoyle at ucdavis.edu]
Sent: October-03-18 10:35 PM
To: de Queiroz, Kevin
Cc: cpn at listserv.ohio.edu; mclanger at ffclrp.usp.br
Subject: Re: [CPN] Proposed New Articles Regarding Panclade Names

Hello Kevin,

This looks fine, except that in line 3 of Article 14.5, “panclade” should be “panclade names,” shouldn’t it?

In line 3 of 14.2, do you mean “precedence of a crown clade name on which a panclade name is based”? Or is it understood that this is what "precedence of a panclade name" means? Maybe I’m just being a little slow late in the evening.

Jim

On Oct 3, 2018, at 1:42 PM, de Queiroz, Kevin <deQueirozK at si.edu<mailto:deQueirozK at si.edu>> wrote:

Dear CPN members,

As the result of a case that emerged while editing some of the last contributions to the Phylonyms volume, it seemed necessary to draft a couple of new articles to maintain the relationships between panclade names and the names of the corresponding crown clades, which Phil and I are now submitting to the CPN for approval.  Please comment on or approve these new articles by October 17.  Thanks.

Kevin de Queiroz
<Proposed New Articles 10.7 & 14.5.docx>_______________________________________________
CPN mailing list
CPN at listserv.ohio.edu<mailto:CPN at listserv.ohio.edu>
http://listserv.ohio.edu/mailman/listinfo/cpn

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.ohio.edu/pipermail/cpn/attachments/20181004/47a037a5/attachment.html>