[CPN] Proposed New Articles Regarding Panclade Names

[James Doyle]

Hello Kevin,

This looks fine, except that in line 3 of Article 14.5, “panclade” should be “panclade names,” shouldn’t it?

In line 3 of 14.2, do you mean “precedence of a crown clade name on which a panclade name is based”? Or is it understood that this is what "precedence of a panclade name" means? Maybe I’m just being a little slow late in the evening.

Jim 

> On Oct 3, 2018, at 1:42 PM, de Queiroz, Kevin <deQueirozK at si.edu <mailto:deQueirozK at si.edu>> wrote:
> 
> Dear CPN members,
>  
> As the result of a case that emerged while editing some of the last contributions to the Phylonyms volume, it seemed necessary to draft a couple of new articles to maintain the relationships between panclade names and the names of the corresponding crown clades, which Phil and I are now submitting to the CPN for approval.  Please comment on or approve these new articles by October 17.  Thanks.
>  
> Kevin de Queiroz
> <Proposed New Articles 10.7 & 14.5.docx>_______________________________________________
> CPN mailing list
> CPN at listserv.ohio.edu <mailto:CPN at listserv.ohio.edu>
> http://listserv.ohio.edu/mailman/listinfo/cpn <http://listserv.ohio.edu/mailman/listinfo/cpn>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.ohio.edu/pipermail/cpn/attachments/20181003/45c70259/attachment-0001.html>