[CPN] Art. 1.1 and the term "taxon" in the PhyloCode; PLEASE VOTE

[Cantino, Philip]

This change is fine with me.  My preference would be "frequently used", but either of the other two suggestions (often used, commonly used) would be fine with me too.  If there is anyone who objects to this change, including those who already voted, please say so.  If no one objects, we will assume that the Yes vote (which is unanimous at this point with only one person not having voted) includes this change and correcting the glossary definition of "taxon" as pointed out by David.

Phil

On Mar 2, 2013, at 10:57 AM, Michel Laurin wrote:

> On 02/03/13 15:05, David Marjanovic wrote:
>> I agree with all changes, including those by Michel, except:
>> 
>> Art. 1.1: The last sentence now reads: "However, species, whose names
>> are governed by the rank-based codes, are used to define clade names in
>> this code." This could be misread as saying that _only_ species are used
>> to define clade names. I'd therefore prefer "are
>> often/frequently/commonly used" or suchlike.
>> 
>> The same sentence occurs in the glossary entry for "taxon", except that
>> Michel forgot to change "traditional" to "rank-based".
>> 
>> That's all. :-)
>> _______________________________________________
>> CPN mailing list
>> CPN at listserv.ohio.edu
>> http://listserv.ohio.edu/mailman/listinfo/cpn
>> 
> Thanks for these comments David. I agree with them.
> 
> Michel
> 
> -- 
> Michel Laurin
> UMR 7207
> Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle
> Batiment de Géologie	
> Case postale 48
> 43 rue Buffon
> F-75231 Paris cedex 05
> FRANCE
> http://www2.mnhn.fr/hdt203/info/laurin.php
> _______________________________________________
> CPN mailing list
> CPN at listserv.ohio.edu
> http://listserv.ohio.edu/mailman/listinfo/cpn