<div dir="ltr">
<br>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 10pt;line-height:115%;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">EDAD 6020, Response to Angelica Gamon<span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 10pt;line-height:115%;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:0.5in;margin:0in 0in 10pt;line-height:115%;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Rational systems run
smoothly because they are structured, in that labor is divided among members. Like
you stated, these members are all striving toward the same goal. <span> </span>In regards to perceptual lenses, this best
represents the structural lens, which is comparable to the way in which a
factory is run. However, within a natural system, members may not share a
common goal, but all want to feel as if they are part of the system. Effective communication
among members keeps these systems running. If one were to view this system through
a perceptual lens, it would be obvious this system fits in the human resource
lens- where human relations empower members. </span><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:rgb(34,34,34);background:white">In regards to perceptual
lenses, an open/social systems best represent the political lens. In that those
within the particular system and those outside systems most likely have
different goals. This could become political if conflict arises, like you
stated it is less likely that goals will be agreed upon by everyone. Both sides
will seek opportunities to build power, and advocate for their system.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:0.5in;margin:0in 0in 10pt;line-height:115%;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:rgb(34,34,34);background:white"><u> </u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:0.5in;margin:0in 0in 10pt;line-height:115%;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:rgb(34,34,34);background:white"><u><br></u></span></p>
<b id="gmail-m_-1966616503117913041gmail-docs-internal-guid-492b5010-dd40-37a2-49bd-90a64e655eac" style="font-size:12.8px;text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;font-weight:normal"><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap">Rational systems are a set of goals that are set to achieve a predetermined set of goals. This groups’ purpose is to share a common goal. They combine them with a similar skill. Most commonly, in the school system, this group would fall into the support staff (cooks, custodians, bus drivers, etc.). </span></p><br><br><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap">Unlike rational systems, natural systems do not share a common goal. This happens because there are conflicting goals within in the groups. This group is typically made up of teachers. The reason for this is because of the departmentalizing the content areas.</span></p><br><br><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap">Open/social systems are made up the the entire staff, as well as the community. With this system being made up of everybody, it is less likely to be able to make a set of goals that can be agreed upon by everybody.</span></p></b><br class="gmail-m_-1966616503117913041gmail-Apple-interchange-newline" style="font-size:12.8px;text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial">
<br></div>