[Itech] Fwd: Tomorrow's Professor eNewsletter: 1291. A Look into the Near Future (of the Virtual Classroom)

Teresa Franklin franklit at ohio.edu
Tue Nov 19 05:08:48 EST 2013

Hi Graduates,

Thought you might be interested in this.

Dr. Franklin

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rick Reis <reis at stanford.edu>
Date: Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 3:10 AM
Subject: Tomorrow's Professor eNewsletter: 1291. A Look into the Near
Future (of the Virtual Classroom)
To: tomorrows-professor at lists.stanford.edu

   Please click here if e-mail below is not displayed
Tomorrow's Professor eNewsletter, Sponsored by Stanford Center for Teaching
and Learning]
*What can institutions, instructors, and their students expect to see over
the next few years as online learning becomes an even greater part of not
only the academy but the K-12 world as well?  Although there continue to be
no certain answers to these questions, we suspect that we will see more
changes in the following areas: technology, course, and program quality and
development; professional development; the ways in which faculty and
students interact; and increased research into online education.*

1291. A Look into the Near Future (of the Virtual Classroom)


[image: Rick Reis]

The posting below, a bit longer than most, looks at what might be in store
in the next few years for online education. It is from Chapter Nine,
Lessons Learned in the Virtual Classroom, in the book, Lessons from the
Virtual Classroom: The Realities of Online Teaching, by Rena M. Palloff &
Keith Pratt, eds. Second Edition. Published by Jossey-Bass: A Wiley
Imprint. One Montgomery Street, Suite 1200. San Francisco, CA 94104-4594
www.josseybass.com. Copyright © 2013 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights
reserved. Reprinted with permission.

Rick Reis

reis at stanford.edu

        Anyone can subscribe
our website     TomProf
us on Facebook and Twitter   [image: Tomorrow's Professor Facebook
Page]<http://www.facebook.com/TomorrowsProfessor> [image:
Tomorrow's Professor Twitter] <http://twitter.com/tomorrowsprof>
    To help us understand more fully the backgrounds and interests of
Tomorrow's Professor eNewsletter subscribes would you please take a few
minutes to participate in our online survey and in the process receive a
complementary electronic copy of, "Update: 2012 and Beyond," the 38 page
addendum to the book, Tomorrow's Professor: Preparing for Academic Careers
in Science and Engineering, originally published in 1997. Thank you.
IN SURVEY <https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/53C52W2>
UP NEXT: Effective Teaching Behaviors

Tomorrow's Teaching and Learning

---------- 2,862 words ----------

A Look into the Near Future (of the Virtual Classroom)

As we look at the lessons from the virtual classroom that we have learned
thus far - some of them painful, others positive - we continue to think
about what the future holds for online education.  What can institutions,
instructors, and their students expect to see over the next few years as
online learning becomes an even greater part of not only the academy but
the K-12 world as well?  Although there continue to be no certain answers
to these questions, we suspect that we will see more changes in the
following areas: technology, course, and program quality and development;
professional development; the ways in which faculty and students interact;
and increased research into online education.  As we explore each of these,
we begin to fit together the pieces of the mosaic that is the future of
online education and higher education as a whole.


With the move to mobile technology, which has become increasingly
affordable, access to online courses is improving, and the ability to use
chat, audio, and video will continue to become more accessible and
therefore more usable in an online class.  At the same time, commercially
developed and owned course management systems have become increasingly
expensive, allowing open source course management systems to flourish.
 Both commercial and open source systems have become more responsive to
user demands and needs, incorporating social networking tools, wikis, and
blogs into the systems and generally becoming more robust, allowing
inclusion of multimedia tools.

It has been predicted, however, that course management systems may become a
thing of the past as personalized learning spaces become the norm.
 Students may be given spaces on a server individually or in groups, or
they may establish their own space online using applications such as Google
Apps, where they can collect learning objects, interact with others, and
collaborate on projects to pursue their own learning goals.  McLoughlin and
Lee (2009) note that with the advent of Web 2.0 and social networking
tools, learner control over the learning process needs to be encouraged.
They state, " Digital-age students want an active learning experience that
is social, participatory and supported by social media" (p. 639).
 Personalized learning spaces allow students to create learning experiences
by accessing and engaging in learning communities across the globe and
piecing together learning that is meaningful to them. Personalization
allows students to determine what they learn as well as when and how.  In
personalized learning, learners are guided by a teacher who helps to
co-create and co-design the learning experience.  Hargreaves and Shirley
(2009) note that this is an important means by which to create more
flexibility in learning experiences, but they also warn that this should
not simply be used as a means by which to incorporate more multimedia into
learning.  They express the concern that personalized learning could be
mistaken for something deeper than what it is.  The debate about
personalized learning spaces is likely to occur for quite some time as more
traditional academics wrestle with the concept and more learners gravitate
toward it.

As the demand for online education continues to grow, we are likely to see
additional means by which this form of education can be delivered.
 Simultaneously, as universities become more informed consumers of
technology, increasing demand for responsiveness and quality is likely.

Course and Program Quality and Design

There is little agreement at present as to what constitutes a quality
online course or program.  Furthermore, the accrediting of Jones
International University by the North Central Association of Schools and
Colleges in 1999 raised significant concerns on the part of faculty and
traditional institutions about how the accreditation of completely online
programs might be accomplished.  Questions included these:  "Can
accreditors truly evaluate a university based solely on distance
learning-with classrooms, libraries, and faculty members located somewhere
in cyberspace-in the same way that they evaluate a traditional institution?
 Can we really call those institutions 'colleges' or 'universities' if they
lack both a critical core of full-time faculty members and a system of
governance by which the faculty is responsible for developing curricula and
academic policy?  Can accreditors actually determine that new, on-line
institutions meet the same basic criteria for quality-or at least
equivalent criteria-that traditional accredited institutions must meet?"
(Perley & Tanguay, 1999, p. B4).

These questions, first posed more than a decade ago, are still being asked,
begging the need to develop quality standards that are accepted across
institutions.  The Quality Matters Program (QM) has been one response, and
the QM rubric has become increasingly recognized as a good measure of
quality in an online course.  A course that bears the QM stamp of approval
is generally recognized as a good one.  QM, however, deals with design
only, not the facilitation of the course, although these standards are now
in development.  In order to truly assess course quality, both must be
taken into account.  Thus, continued work needs to occur on what is
considered best practice in online facilitation.  The International
Association for K-12 Online Learning standards developed for K-12 online
teaching are a good example and could guide higher education as well.

Despite this, we hope that standards will be created with an eye toward
academic freedom.  There is wide variation occurring in current course
development, yielding a need for discussions of quality in online program
development.  The ideal outcome of those discussions should be a range
within which faculty and institutions can comfortably work.

Professional Development

What does it really mean to be a "guide on the side"  or a "learning
facilitator" rather than an instructor?  How does an instructor
successfully make the transition required to teach an online course so that
students become empowered learners and take charge of the learning process?
 Is it possible to develop every instructor into a good online instructor?
 How can institutions tell the difference between someone who will do well
online and someone who will not, be they faculty or student?

The questions are designed to help stimulate thinking about what might be
needed in a good training and development program for faculty.  However,
they also point out that we need to think carefully about who should be
encouraged to teach online.  Earlier in this book, we made the point that
not all faculty are suited to the online environment, just as not all
students should consider taking online courses.  We even put forth the
fairly controversial idea that faculty who are highly entertaining
face-to-face may not make the best online instructors.  Not all faculty,
even after participating in online teacher training, will do well in that
environment.  And although some authors predict that the face-to-face,
traditional classrooms will go the way of the Model T (Barone & Luker,
2000), we believe it is more likely that most colleges and universities
will deliver at least a portion of their course offerings online, a trend
that is already emerging (Allen et al., 2012).  Consequently there will be
room for those who choose to teach in the classroom along those who choose
to teach online.

Greater attention should be paid to what instructors need to be able to
teach online successfully.  Rather than focusing on the technology itself,
training and faculty development should focus on increasing interactivity
in online classes, building a learning community among the learners,
delivering course content in new and creative ways, incorporating
collaboration into the learning process, empowering learners, and
evaluating learners and learning outcomes in ways that make sense in the
online arena. As faculty become veteran facilitators online and as the
online learning environment itself evolves, training and development needs
will change.  Consequently, faculty development to prepare faculty to teach
successfully online should be fluid and responsive to the changes that are
to come.

How Faculty and Students Interact

One of the changes already occurring that has been noted is the ways in
which faculty and students interact.  Today's student is less likely to be
an eighteen to twenty-one year old seeking a one-time educational
experience.  Instead, today's online student is likely to be a member of a
range of students, from those in K-12 classrooms, to those considered to be
traditional undergraduates, to adults returning to school to obtain
knowledge and skills needed to compete and advance in the workplace. Adult
students are more likely to be lifelong learners embarking on the beginning
of what may be a learning process that results in the pursuit of multiple
degrees, courses, or certifications.   However, even traditional
undergraduates are seeking learning experiences that will lead to
employment, and colleges and universities are being asked by governmental
entities to demonstrate that their course and program offerings will do so.
 Although previously schooled to engage with instructors in traditional
ways-expecting the instructor to be the expert with knowledge and wisdom to
impart-lifelong learners are looking to enter a partnership that results in
the achievement of their learning objectives (Bates, 2000; McLoughlin &
Lee, 2009).

The partnership students seek is with an academic institution that
understands their needs and is capable of meeting them. Thus, a shift is
occurring in the academic world; academic institutions are recognizing that
like other types of organizations, they must be responsive to those they
serve.  The result is a shift from the traditional faculty-centered
institution to a learner focus.  Consequently, the relationship between
faculty and student has to change as well.

Add technology and online teaching to the mix, and other changes begin to
occur.  Because the most effective way to achieve learning outcomes in the
online classroom is by using active learning techniques, students are
encouraged to become empowered learners.  Today's technologies promote the
ability of learners to significantly contribute to and co-create their
learning experiences.  More fully engaged, active learners are likely to
bring new demands to the learning situation and will not be able to return
to business as usual in subsequent learning situations, face-to-face or
online.  We noted that the changed relationship between faculty and student
in the online classroom is spilling over into the face-to-face classroom as
faculty discover that active learning techniques work well there.
 Similarly, faculty who have historically made good use of active learning
techniques face-to-face are finding that their transition to online
learning is eased through the use of those techniques. Bates (2000) notes,
"Modern learning theory sees learning as an individual quest for meaning
and relevance.  Once learning moves beyond the recall of facts, principles,
or correct procedures and into the area of creativity, problem solving,
analysis, or evaluation (the very skills needed in the workplace in a
knowledge-based economy, not to mention in life in general), learners need
the opportunity to communicate with one another as well as with their
teachers.  This of course includes the opportunity to question, challenge,
and discuss issues" (pp. 13-14).

The emergence of MOOCs is an interesting development that is calling into
question not only the ways in which instructors and students interact but
also delivery models of higher education.  According to Stewart (2012), the
originators of the concept, Stephen Downs, George Siemens, and Dave
Cormier, were looking to devise an alternative environment for learning and
were not necessarily intending to disrupt higher education as we know it.
Using a lecture-based model that mimics the flipped classroom, MOOCs offer
snippets of lectures that are twelve to fifteen minutes long, with quizzes
and other assignments to be completed in between lectures.  MOOCs are
currently not credit-bearing courses and are not the same as the type of
online course we have been discussing, but pathways to college credit are
being forged at the time of is writing, and it will be interesting to see
the impact this has on the direction of online learning in the future.

Currently, MOOCs are being offered by many elite universities as well as
for-profit entities that are partnering with universities to offer MOOCs.
 They are free and capable of enrolling tens of thousands of students.
 Although predominantly lecture based, some involve the ability to network
with other participants.  Kim (2012) comments on the differences between
what are now termed traditional online courses and MOOCs by stating, "A
well-constructed traditional online course is not a vessel to deliver
content from the brains of the professor to the brains of the students, but
rather an opportunity for faculty to guide, shape, reinforce, and support
student learning... This work requires that the faculty have the
opportunity to interact with the students" (para, 9). Are MOOCs a threat,
or will they help us to re-examine the ways we currently offer courses and

Rather than feeling threatened by this shift in relationship and course
design, faculty should feel challenged by it.  Faculty too are lifelong
learners.  The changing relationship with their students serves to expand
the network through which they can learn. When we enter a new online
course, we always believe that we have as much to learn from our students
as they do from us.  We find this to be an exciting element of our online
work and one that we welcome.

Research into Online Education

When we wrote our first book in 1999, we found a paucity of research on
online learning.  However, we noted that interest in the area was growing
and that the research would follow.  That prediction has become
increasingly true as online learning has established a stronghold in higher
education.  Individual instructors are writing and publishing articles
about their experiences online.  Studies are being conducted that compare
face-to-face and online delivery of the same class for outcome
effectiveness. The Institute for Higher Education Policy published a report
(Phipps & Merisotis, 1999) reviewing contemporary research on the
effectiveness of distance learning.  Since that time, many studies have
been published looking at the characteristics of effective online courses
and the critical elements practice that supports their development.

Because this is a growing area in academia with exciting new developments
emerging daily, research efforts are likely to increase and continue.
 Those of us teaching online welcome the opportunity to contribute to this
body of literature.  The educational experiences that are the result of
teaching online are so different from those that we have had in the
traditional classroom that we want to share them with our colleagues so
that they might understand the power of online teaching in delivering
education in today's knowledge society.

James Duderstadt (1999) noted:

Today's technology is rapidly breaking the constraints of space and time.
 It has become clear that most people, in most areas, can learn-and learn
well-using asynchronous learning (that is "anytime, anyplace, anywhere"
education)... Lifetime education is becoming a reality, making learning
available for anyone who wants to learn, at the time and place of their
choice, without great personal effort or cost... Rather than an "age of
knowledge," could we instead aspire to a "culture of learning," in which
people are continually surrounded by, immersed in, and absorbed in learning
experiences? ... This may become not only the great challenge but the
compelling vision facing higher education as it enters the next millennium.
(pp. 24-25)

This prophetic statement has proven true.  Research that documents the
effectiveness of our efforts in creating the culture of learning to which
Duderstadt refers has occurred and continues to emerge.  Sharing our
experiences and lessons learned, whether positive or negative, as we
explore the territory of online learning is equally important.

We closed our first book, Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace, by
commenting on our own experience of online teaching: "Not only are we
helping to shape the creating of empowered, lifelong learners, our
participation as equal members of a group of learners supports us in our
quest for lifelong learning.  For us, this is the power of online distance
learning" (Palloff & Pratt, 1999, p. 168).  Stansbury (2011) supports this
statement and what we have been discussing in ths book by providing five
characteristics of the effective educator today: anticipates the future, is
a lifelong learner, fosters peer relationships, can teach and assess all
levels of learners, and is able to discern effective versus ineffective
technology.  Today this not only remains true for us but increases with
every online class we teach, every book we write, ad every faculty group we
train.  We never cease to learn.  We also never cease to wonder about and
seek out what might be next. We have only begun to explore the virtual
classroom and its important and powerful role in the future of education.

Tips for Creating Successful Courses and Programs

   - Always strive to make online courses as interactive as possible.
   - Use multiple means to deliver content and evaluate student progress.
   - Give faculty a voice in the selection of technology and in
   policy-making around course ownership, governance, compensation, course
   loads and class size, and intellectual property.
   - Provide training for both faculty and students in the new roles
   required to create online learning communities and complete courses
   - Provide adequate administrative and technical support to faculty who
   are developing and delivering courses and to students who are enrolled in
   - Include issues such as course development, purchase of technology,
   faculty compensation for course development and delivery, and training in
   the institution's strategic plan and budget for a strong infrastructure to
   support online courses and programs.


Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., Lederman, D., & Jaschik, S. (2012) Conflicted:
Faculty and online education, 2012. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog
Research Group.

Barone C., & Luker, M. (2000). The role of advanced networks in the
education of the future. In M. Luker (Ed.), Preparing your campus for a
networked future. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Bates, A. W. (2000). Managing technological change. San Francisco:

Duderstadt, J. (1999). Can colleges and universities survive in the
information age? In R. Katz & Associates (Eds.), Dancing with the devil.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2009). The far side of educational reform.
Ottawa: Canadian Teachers' Federation.  Retrieved from

Kim, J. (2012 July 18). Parsing the NYTimes coverage of the growth of
MOOCs. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from

McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M.J.W. (2009). Personalised learning spaces and
self-regulated learning: Global examples of effective pedagogy. In Same
places, different spaces. Proceedings Ascilite Auckland 2009. Retrieved
from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/aucklan09/procs/mcloughlin.pdf

Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (1999).  Building learning communities in
cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco:

Perley, J., & Tanguay, M. (1999, October 29).  Accrediting on-line
institutions diminishes higher education. Chronicle of Higher Education,

Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999, April). What's the difference?
 Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.

         "Desktop faculty development 100 times per year."
Over 50,000 subscribers at over 850 institutions in more than 100 countries


Archives of all past postings can be found

Sponsored by Stanford Center for Teaching and Learning<http://ctl.stanford.edu>

Check out the Tomorrow's Professor Blog<http://derekbruff.org/blogs/tomprof/>

NOTE: To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to the Tomorrows-Professor List
click HERE<https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/tomorrows-professor>
  [image: Tomorrow's Professor Facebook
Page]<http://www.facebook.com/TomorrowsProfessor> [image:
Tomorrow's Professor Twitter] <http://twitter.com/tomorrowsprof>

tomorrows-professor mailing list
tomorrows-professor at lists.stanford.edu


*"A teacher affects eternity; [she]he can never tell where the influence
stops." - Henry Adams*Dr. Teresa Franklin
Professor, Instructional Technology
313D McCracken Hall*, *Dept. Educational Studies
The Gladys W. and David H. Patton College of Education
Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701
740-593-4561 (office)
740-541-8847 (cell)
740-593-0477 (fax)
also: franklinteresa at gmail.com
*~~~~~~The best student-centered learning *experience in America~~~~
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserv.ohio.edu/pipermail/itech/attachments/20131119/08b1a7bd/attachment-0001.html 

More information about the Itech mailing list