<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
I am forwarding some comments from Max Langer, who for some reason is not receiving messages through the listserv.
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Phil</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
<div><br class="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">Begin forwarded message:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px;" class="">
<span style="font-family: -webkit-system-font, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 1.0);" class=""><b class="">From:
</b></span><span style="font-family: -webkit-system-font, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, sans-serif;" class="">Max Langer <<a href="mailto:mclanger@ffclrp.usp.br" class="">mclanger@ffclrp.usp.br</a>><br class="">
</span></div>
<div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px;" class="">
<span style="font-family: -webkit-system-font, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 1.0);" class=""><b class="">Subject:
</b></span><span style="font-family: -webkit-system-font, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, sans-serif;" class=""><b class="">Re: [CPN] Proposed changes to PhyloCode rules on publication</b><br class="">
</span></div>
<div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px;" class="">
<span style="font-family: -webkit-system-font, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 1.0);" class=""><b class="">Date:
</b></span><span style="font-family: -webkit-system-font, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, sans-serif;" class="">March 1, 2018 at 9:24:31 AM EST<br class="">
</span></div>
<div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px;" class="">
<span style="font-family: -webkit-system-font, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 1.0);" class=""><b class="">To:
</b></span><span style="font-family: -webkit-system-font, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, sans-serif;" class="">"Cantino, Philip" <<a href="mailto:cantino@ohio.edu" class="">cantino@ohio.edu</a>><br class="">
</span></div>
<br class="">
<div class="">
<div dir="ltr" class="">
<div class="">
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""> Hi Phil,</div>
<div class=""> </div>
<div class=""> Firstly deeply sorry for the delay, as I told you, it came as a complete memory lapse.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""> I was not sure if I should send the below comments only to you (as I did in the end) or to
<a href="mailto:cpn@listserv.ohio.edu" class="">cpn@listserv.ohio.edu</a>. </div>
<div class=""> In any case, if needed, feel free to forward to the rest of the committee. </div>
<div class=""> Please, also include me on the list; I am not sure how the discussion is being conducted, as I have only received your personal emails so far.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""> Thanks again for the opportunity to participate in these decisions.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""> As for the comments:</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""> I am not sure why the text gives so much emphasis on peer review (4.2; 4.2.1). </div>
<div class=""> It is obviously desirable for the sake of the quality if the work, but I believe code provisions should not concern about that. </div>
<div class=""> I understand that, if a name is proposed following the PhyloCode rules, and is ISSN/ISBN registered, it does not really matter if it was peer reviewed or not. </div>
<div class=""> Well, this was in the original text, not in the modifications, so the committee probably has already decided on that, I just wanted to mention my opinion.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""> Particularly in 4.2.1 it is not clear how would someone state that a particular chapter in a book or article in a journal was itself peer-reviewed? </div>
<div class=""> Of course, 4.2.1 would be redundant if peer review was not a concern.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""> In agreement with 4.3-4.5.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""> In 4.6, shouldn’t pen-drives and alike be included as storage medias?</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""> This comment has something to do with those from Michel Laurin on 4.5 and Sean Graham on 5.1. </div>
<div class=""> Shouldn’t we include provisions similar to that of 5.4 (on separates) for those advanced online publications that are not even in the shape of the final paper (not only missing dates, issues, etc.). </div>
<div class=""> Frequently they are not proof-checked versions and will be corrected for final publication. </div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""> On 7.2.2, I agree with Sean Graham that “electronic supplements” can be considered published if they are properly archived and permanent. </div>
<div class=""> In any case, in the text as it is (perhaps my English is not helping and I am missing something here), shouldn’t “may” (end of second line) be replaced by something like “should”. </div>
<div class=""> The idea isn’t that because these items are important they should not be only in the “electronic supplements”.</div>
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""> I hope this is of some help.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""> Again, sorry for the delay/confusion.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""> Cheers,</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""> max</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br class="">
</div>
</body>
</html>