[CPN] Proposed New Articles Regarding Panclade Names

[de Queiroz, Kevin]

Dear CPN members,

I have added “names” to Article 14.5 as suggested by Jim Doyle.  That was a simple error.

Regarding Article 14.2, I have modified the article along the lines suggested by Jim but with a somewhat different wording (approved by Phil).  The article now reads (new material in bold, deletions in strikethru):

14.2.  If there are two or more synonyms for a clade, the accepted name for that clade is the earliest acceptable one that applies to it, except in cases of conservation (Art. 15), or precedence of a panclade name (Arts. 14.4), or precedence of a younger panclade name over an older one to maintain consistency with crown clade names (Art. 14.5).

There is no need to approve these changes if you have already approved the previous version.  If you have not approved the new articles, please do so, or let us know of other problems, by 17 October.

Thanks.

Kevin

From: "James A. Doyle" <jadoyle at ucdavis.edu>
Date: Thursday, October 4, 2018 at 1:36 AM
To: Kevin de Queiroz <deQueirozK at si.edu>
Cc: "cpn at listserv.ohio.edu" <cpn at listserv.ohio.edu>, "mclanger at ffclrp.usp.br" <mclanger at ffclrp.usp.br>
Subject: Re: [CPN] Proposed New Articles Regarding Panclade Names

Hello Kevin,

This looks fine, except that in line 3 of Article 14.5, “panclade” should be “panclade names,” shouldn’t it?

In line 3 of 14.2, do you mean “precedence of a crown clade name on which a panclade name is based”? Or is it understood that this is what "precedence of a panclade name" means? Maybe I’m just being a little slow late in the evening.

Jim


On Oct 3, 2018, at 1:42 PM, de Queiroz, Kevin <deQueirozK at si.edu<mailto:deQueirozK at si.edu>> wrote:

Dear CPN members,

As the result of a case that emerged while editing some of the last contributions to the Phylonyms volume, it seemed necessary to draft a couple of new articles to maintain the relationships between panclade names and the names of the corresponding crown clades, which Phil and I are now submitting to the CPN for approval.  Please comment on or approve these new articles by October 17.  Thanks.

Kevin de Queiroz
<Proposed New Articles 10.7 & 14.5.docx>_______________________________________________
CPN mailing list
CPN at listserv.ohio.edu<mailto:CPN at listserv.ohio.edu>
http://listserv.ohio.edu/mailman/listinfo/cpn

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.ohio.edu/pipermail/cpn/attachments/20181010/d0b7203e/attachment.html>