[CPN] Proposed additions to the PhyloCode (Art. 9)

[Cantino, Philip]

Dear CPN members,

Since there has been no further discussion, I think it is time to vote.  Please respond to this email with a Yes or No vote for this set of changes.  I think it would be fine to vote on particular changes individually if you prefer, but we will interpret a simple “Yes” or “No” to refer to all of the proposed changes unless you state otherwise.

It would be helpful if everyone would vote by the end of next week (July 13).

Thank you.

Best regards,
Phil


> On Jul 3, 2018, at 7:26 PM, Cantino, Philip <cantino at ohio.edu> wrote:
> 
> Dear CPN members,
> 
> The discussion seems to have been concluded, so I am hoping there is no objection to voting this week.  If you do want to continue the discussion further, please respond by this Thursday evening.  If no one responds, I will ask for a vote on Friday.  There is no need to reply to this message unless you would like to discuss the proposed changes further before voting.
> 
> Best regards,
> Phil
> 
> 
>> On Jun 18, 2018, at 11:58 AM, Cantino, Philip <cantino at ohio.edu> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear CPN members,
>> 
>> Kevin and I are proposing the attached additions to Article 9 to clarify points of confusion that we became aware of in the process of editing Phylonyms contributions.  These are probably the last changes in the code that we will propose before the manuscript is finalized. 
>> 
>> If you have comments or questions, please send them to the listserv by June 30.  If there is no ongoing discussion at that point, I will call for a vote.   Please do not vote yet, in case there is discussion before June 30.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Phil
>> 
>> <For CPN--Additions to Article 9_draft 2.copy to send to CPN.docx>
>