[CPN] Proposed changes to PhyloCode rules on publication

[Michel LAURIN]

Thanks Sean, hi everybody, 

I think that we need to discuss some of these points. Here are (attached) a few comments from me. 

Best wishes, 

Michel 


De: "Graham, Sean" <swgraham at mail.ubc.ca> 
À: "Committee on Phylogenetic Nomenclature" <cpn at listserv.ohio.edu> 
Envoyé: Mardi 13 Février 2018 18:35:09 
Objet: Re: [CPN] Proposed changes to PhyloCode rules on publication 


I had a couple of quick questions/comments (attached) 

Sean 



From: CPN [cpn-bounces at listserv.ohio.edu] on behalf of Cantino, Philip [cantino at ohio.edu] 
Sent: February-13-18 6:21 AM 
To: Committee on Phylogenetic Nomenclature 
Subject: Re: [CPN] Proposed changes to PhyloCode rules on publication 

Dear CPN members, 

I hope by now you have all had time to read the proposed changes in Article 4 and related changes in Articles 5 and 7. Please send your comments to the listserv ( [ mailto:cpn at listserv.ohio.edu | cpn at listserv.ohio.edu ] ), not to me personally. 

Regards, 
Phil 






On Feb 6, 2018, at 3:09 PM, Cantino, Philip < [ mailto:cantino at ohio.edu | cantino at ohio.edu ] > wrote: 

Dear CPN members, 

Having now updated the CPN listserv membership, I am sending material for your consideration. As many of you are aware, the PhyloCode articles on what constitutes publication need to be revised to address electronic publication. I think the CPN was in general agreement on this point several years ago, but the details remained to be worked out. Over the past several months, Nico Cellinese and Dick Olmstead drafted a set of revisions to the current rules. Kevin and I then reviewed them, leading to further discussion among the four of us. The result is attached (“proposed publication requirements”). 

Three other documents are also attached: “current publication requirements” (as they exist in PhyloCode version 5); “publication requirements with changes tracked”; and the full PhyloCode 5, in case some of you don’t have a copy on your computer. As you will see from the document with the tracked changes, most are in Article 4, but a few related changes are proposed in Articles 5 and 7. 

I want to be sure that this message was received by the four new members (Jim Doyle, Micah Dunthorn, Sean Graham, and Max Cardoso Langer) and the two continuing members whose email addresses I just updated on the listserv (Michel Laurin and Dick Olmstead). Therefore, I’d appreciate it if the six of you would email me to confirm that you received this. 

Let’s give everyone the rest of the week to read the proposed changes before we start discussing them. Although the revised text is not long, everyone is busy and I realize some of you may not have time to focus on this right away. I will be back in touch on Monday to ask for comments. 

The address when emailing this listserv is [ mailto:cpn at listserv.ohio.edu | 
cpn at listserv.ohio.edu ] . 

Best regards, 
Phil 



<Publication requirements with changes tracked.docx> <proposed publication requirements.docx> <PhyloCode 5 beta version.pdf> <current publication requirements.docx> 






_______________________________________________ 
CPN mailing list 
CPN at listserv.ohio.edu 
http://listserv.ohio.edu/mailman/listinfo/cpn 

-- 
Michel Laurin 
CR2P, UMR 7207 
Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle 
Bâtiment de Géologie 
Case postale 48 
43 rue Buffon 
F-75231 Paris cedex 05 
FRANCE 
http://www2.mnhn.fr/hdt203/info/laurin.php 
E-mail: michel.laurin at mnhn.fr 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.ohio.edu/pipermail/cpn/attachments/20180213/57a7ba3e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: proposed publication requirements ML.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 155540 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.ohio.edu/pipermail/cpn/attachments/20180213/57a7ba3e/attachment-0001.docx>