[CPN] Call for a vote on deletion of Note 13.2.2 and changes in Rec. 21.3A

[Cantino, Philip]

The typo is just in my message, not in the document that I edited.  Thanks for pointing it out, though.
Phil


On Apr 11, 2013, at 1:10 PM, David Marjanovic wrote:

>> With this change, Art. 11.8 now reads:  When a specimen that is not a type is used as a specifier in a phylogenetic definition, the institution or collection in which the specifier is conserved must be identified, as well as the collection number or other information needed to identity the specimen unambiguously.
>  
> ...identi_f_y, not identi_t_y, I hope... :-]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CPN mailing list
> CPN at listserv.ohio.edu
> http://listserv.ohio.edu/mailman/listinfo/cpn